Reason MagazineFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureLean RightLean RightBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

A smartphone showing LinkedIn's logo, the Department of Justice building, and the DOJ logo against a blue background

4 hours ago · reason.com

Google NewsFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureLean LeftLean LeftBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

4th Circuit Rebukes Trump Administration for Asking LinkedIn To Turn Over Info on Critics in the News Media Yahoo

4 hours ago · news.google.com

Ars TechnicaFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureCenterCenterBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

Confidential sources “lifeblood” of free press, court rules in LinkedIn fight.

6 hours ago · arstechnica.com

Raw StoryFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureLeftLeftBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

A federal appeals court sharply rebuked President Donald Trump's Justice Department over a secret effort that reached far beyond its target. A unanimous three-judge panel of the 4th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled Tuesday that the government's secret orders forcing LinkedIn to turn over 18 months of journalists' records, while gagging the company from telling anyone, were "substantially overbroad" and threatened to expose confidential sources with "no conceivable relationship" to the leak investigation behind them. The case stems from a probe into a news outlet's article "purporting to…

23 hours ago · rawstory.com

The New York TimesFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureLean LeftLean LeftBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

The court said that the request was too broad and could reveal numerous unrelated confidential sources.

Yesterday · nytimes.com

Inquirer.comFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureLean LeftLean LeftBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

A federal judge must narrow an order requiring LinkedIn to divulge journalists’ communications on the social media platform to the Trump administration for a leak investigation

Yesterday · inquirer.com

The HillFactualityFactuality is a Premium featureCenterCenterBased on the outlet's overall lean; article framing check pending

A federal appeals court’s three-judge panel unanimously limited Tuesday the Trump administration’s broad access to journalists’ LinkedIn records as part of a national security leak investigation, suggesting it could impart a “damaging blow” to First Amendment rights. The ruling, written by Judge J. Harvie Wilkinson, a Reagan appointee, stated the Justice Department’s (DOJ) attempt to…

Yesterday · thehill.com · You are reading this one