Summary from the original article

Short answer: for a legal contract review workspace, use a retrieval architecture with indexed contract text, live changing facts, and citations that preserve tenant and access metadata. For a legal contract review workspace built over a folder of PDFs, relevance tuning starts with an answer contract, not a vector database. The contract should say what may be retrieved, which source identifies it, and how a reviewer can open that source. Recall without access control is a data leak. Precision without…
By FrozenSigh2853916 ·
AI key points, how left, center and right framed this story, tone by side and loaded language are part of News.gg Premium.
Upgrade this serverShort answer: for a legal contract review workspace, use a retrieval architecture with indexed contract text, live changing facts, and citations that preserve tenant and access metadata. For a legal contract review workspace built over a folder of PDFs, relevance tuning starts with an answer contract, not a vector database. The contract should say what may be retrieved, which source identifies it, and how a reviewer can open that source. Recall without access control is a data leak. Precision without a citation is just a confident-looking dead end. My default choice is a hybrid boundary…
3 hours ago · dev.to · You are reading this one